October is here, and the media hullabaloo surrounding what passes for a great man these days has subsided. Thank god. I don’t know about you, but I was completely worn out by Charlie Kirk fatigue. His murder at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on September 10th has been approached from so many different angles, and spawned so many different theories, that I can only condense what’s already out there on the internet, while adding a few thoughts of my own.
Although new information about Kirk, good and bad, has come my way in the last month, I knew about his Turning Point USA road show for quite some time, but I never paid any attention to him. TPUSA struck me as more of a conservative racket than Young Americans for Freedom, which I briefly joined fifty years ago when I was in college, and Kirk struck me as an utterly useless, well-paid prostitute in the best Limbaugh/Hannity/Beck tradition, though his net worth of $12 million was chump change compared to the fortunes of that trio. Along with many presidents, governors, and other politicians, Kirk had made the obligatory trip to Jerusalem to put on a yarmulke and plant his face in the Wailing Wall, a ritual nearly as disgusting, in my view, as dropping to all fours and kissing Netanyahu’s feet. Like our ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, another Wailing Wall smoocher, who recently accused Hamas of killing innocent Palestinians by driving them into the path of Israeli bombs, Kirk was a Zionist Christian lunatic who openly referred to the West Bank as Judea and Samaria, and reflexively cut off any criticism of the Mideast cancer at his free speech shindigs, once dismissing the June 8, 1967 Israeli massacre of 34 American sailors on the U.S.S. Liberty as a conspiracy theory. As for his political IQ, in addition to being an ardent supporter of Donald Trump, he often wore a T-shirt that showed a soaring eagle and the words “AMERICA — THE GOLDEN AGE IS UPON US.” What a moron.
I did not cheer when I learned of Charlie Kirk’s murder. Actually, I muttered, “Oh wow,” and felt a twinge of sadness. The next day, I saw the graphic video of blood gushing from the left side of his neck. It was not pleasant to watch. The tidal wave of news coverage that followed was about all a sane man could take. Naturally, the media reduced it all to the level of idiocy that characterizes political discourse in America: Democrat vs. Republican, Left vs. Right, liberal vs. conservative — like a food fight between children in the school cafeteria. “Ping-pong for retards” is how one astute Internet commentator has put it. Since Conservative Charlie had been such a groveling shabbos goy, however, the media transformed him into a national hero and martyr, while often highlighting remarks made by his detractors, some of whom called him a “Nazi.” It was all very predictable and tiresome.
I had not been aware of Charlie Kirk’s vast outreach at high schools and on college campuses. In this unraveling country, so rotted out by organized Jewry, so lacking in genuine heroes, with so many young Americans facing a bleak, uncertain future, millions of students looked up to this Pied Piper as a source of inspiration, as a man who gave them a glimmer of hope for the years ahead, when all he really did with his crazy ideas was lead them into the swamp of no return. His rise and fall, and what immediately followed his death, parallels the career of President John F. Kennedy, another charismatic leader who was all style and little substance. JFK was assassinated just before my tenth birthday, and I still remember how the country was plunged into grief, along with all the vigils, memorial services, and national soul-searching, not to mention the prolonged media fixation. In so many ways, Kirk’s murder was history repeating itself as a heart-wrenching media production, right down to the elegant widows and two endearing little children, a boy and a girl, who lost their father. What I didn’t know in 1963 was that JFK had feet of clay, and was despised for good reason by millions of genuine patriots, though he did show some grit, especially in the last year of his life, as did Kirk, as we will see. What I was also ignorant about for many years was the nonsense of the Warren Commission report on the JFK assassination, and the backlash it received from Americans who had the capacity to think.
There are probably more than a thousand books published on who killed JFK and why, with as many different theories on the subject. The same phenomenon has taken off this past month. There are even some contrarian comics who insist that Charlie is alive and well, having the last laugh as he sips cocktails on some remote tropical beach. Well, I suppose anything is possible in this age of smoke and mirrors generated by Artificial Intelligence, but I must confess that I don’t believe that. To keep things rational and conserve space, I’ll touch upon just a few details of what has been tossed into the cyberspace arena.
To begin with, the more or less official narrative, as put forth by the FBI, Fox News, and the rest of the legacy media, is so full of holes that it’s quite funny and an obvious cover-up. Question number one: Why, immediately after Kirk was shot, did an elderly Jew named George Zinn make a big fuss, recorded on camera, falsely claiming to be the shooter, with cops rushing to arrest him? What was that all about? What about the story of that mysterious airplane that took off from the airport in nearby Provo an hour after the shooting, then turned off its transponder? Why didn’t the police seal off, with crime scene tape, the area where Kirk had been sitting?
Then there’s Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old who turned himself in the next day and has already been tried and convicted by the media. After all, he had sent incriminating text messages to his transgender roommate, Lance Twiggs, who had been fully cooperating with law enforcement until he left his home on September 24th and hasn’t been seen since. Not only that, but there were various messages engraved on the brass shells loaded in Robinson’s 30.06 rifle. I guess he walked into a jewelry store and asked a worker to inscribe “Hey Fascist! Catch!” with his engraving tool. That was proof enough of his guilt for the conservative rag New York Post, which splashed those words in big front page headlines. Kind of like the passport of terrorist hijacker Satam al-Suqami, which fluttered to the ground after Flight 11 crashed into the south tower of the World Trade Center, and was picked up by an unnamed passerby and turned over to a NYPD detective just before the building collapsed. He done it! In any case, despite the fact that “Hey Fascist! Catch!” and other inscriptions were reported by several media outlets, no photographs of these cartridges have ever been published, so far as I know.
Kash Patel, the brown clown who heads the FBI, filled the country in on a note Robinson had written, which read, “I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I’m going to take it.” He added that the note, which no one had seen, had been destroyed, but the FBI was able to reconstruct its content “through forensic evidence and aggressive interviews.” No details were given. Then there was the story, also pushed by the FBI and the lapdog media, that Robinson, after firing the fatal shot from a rooftop, disassembled the 30.06 rifle, stuffed it in his backpack (a physical impossibility), dropped to the ground, ran into the woods, and reassembled it after which he wrapped a towel around it and left it there. Kash informed us that traces of Robinson’s DNA were found on the towel. If you believe any of this, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas I’d like to sell you.
To make these fairy tales more palatable to Kirk’s fans and conservatives generally, the media hinted that, in addition to Robinson being a pervert, he was a leftist. We have already seen these vague connections in high-profile assassinations. Lee Harvey Oswald, who was instantly fingered as JFK’s assassin, was supposedly a Communist sympathizer who had married a Russian woman and was an admirer of Fidel Castro. He was, of course, conveniently shot to death on live television two days after JFK was gunned down. James Earl Ray, who allegedly assassinated Michael (aka Martin Luther) King on April 4, 1968, as he stood on the balcony of a Memphis motel, is another example. Even before Ray was extradited from England two months later after an intensive manhunt, he was paraded as a racist and a segregationist by the media, with Life magazine taking the lead, although there was no evidence that Ray had any strong feelings about Blacks either way.
The case of James Earl Ray is instructive. Although I was only fourteen at the time of King’s murder and Ray’s arrest, and had no idea of how the world works back then, I still recall the photograph of a sheriff escorting a handcuffed, downcast Ray after he had been flown back to an Air Force base near Memphis, and thinking, “There’s something wrong with this picture. How do they know that this is the guy who did it?” But I didn’t dwell on it and never gave it another thought until twenty years later, when I read Ray’s book Tennessee Waltz, subtitled “The making of a political prisoner.” On the advice of his lawyer, whom he later fired and lambasted, Ray pled guilty to King’s murder to avoid a possible death sentence, and instead was sentenced to 99 years in prison, where he would spend the rest of his life, dying in 1998 at the age of 70. For nearly his entire incarceration, Ray fought to get a new trial, which was always denied him. Tennessee Waltz tells that story, and the rest of his life story, which Ray wrote by himself while in prison. It’s a fascinating book, filled with photographs and photocopies of correspondence and newspaper articles — a searing indictment of federal law enforcement, of the political, judicial and prison systems, and above all of the media. To be sure, Ray was a bona fide criminal, who had been convicted of burglary, armed robbery, and other crimes, including a prison escape, all of which he openly admitted to in his book. But he persistently denied that he had anything to do with King’s assassination. He was also an intelligent man and an excellent writer, whose words have the ring of truth, and it’s worth noting that King’s family always maintained that he was innocent. Like Oswald — and incidentally Timothy McVeigh, of Oklahoma City fame — Ray was a patsy. And everything about Tyler Robinson screams PATSY. You can bet on the following: Robinson will be suicided, or murdered by another inmate, or convicted and executed, or sentenced to life imprisonment and fade into obscurity. Equally certain is that he will never get a fair trial, and in the unlikely event that he even goes to trial it will be in a kangaroo court with no honest media coverage.
Returning to Charlie, there was a great deal of Internet discussion about the absence of an exit wound — a most relevant issue — while others, sincere truth seekers but prone to exaggeration, have claimed, falsely I believe, that Kirk’s head would’ve been blown apart by a 30.06 bullet passing through his neck. As a hunter who has taken several deer with my own 30.06 rifle — a bolt-action Mauser similar to the make-believe murder weapon — I think I’m qualified to comment here on yet another whopper. This one was offered by TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet, who said he spoke with the surgeon who examined Kirk’s body, who claimed that Kirk’s bone structure, meaning the top of his spine, was so strong and dense that it miraculously stopped the bullet which was later removed by the coroner, possibly saving the lives of people who were near him. What a lovely story. Too bad it’s just as ridiculous as the magic bullet theory introduced by the Warren Commission, in which the trajectory of the bullet that killed JFK and lodged in Texas governor John Connally defied physical law. This Kirk as Superman nonsense was uncritically reported by mainstream media across the spectrum. I can tell you from personal experience that a 30.06 round is very powerful and easily plows through flesh and bone, leaving a large, messy exit wound. This caliber is commonly used by hunters on moose and Kodiak bears, the largest of all bear species. It will blast through a human neck like a cream puff. It’s also very loud. It would be quite loud even from a rooftop 200 yards away, yet no shot rings out on any of the videos I watched of Kirk being struck. Instead, I heard a squib, and that takes me right to a riveting 36-second video clip that I saw on rense.com, which for some reason has not gone viral. It shows, with perfect clarity, a man standing mere yards from Kirk — with his left hand on the railing barrier — raise his right fist towards Kirk, after which a muffled sound is heard, Kirk’s head jerks slightly, and he falls to the ground. Then, while everyone in the crowd flees in the opposite direction, this man vaults over the railing and rushes towards Kirk, as do others, presumably members of Kirk’s security team. Unless this video is an AI fabrication — a remote possibility in this age of digital unrealities — there’s your assassin. No smoke and no gun is visible, but that’s a smoking gun if I ever saw one. I had not been aware, at the time, of the existence of tiny “palm pistols” that can be concealed inside a closed fist. The only question in my mind now is whether the assassin actually fired a gun, or as some claim, detonated an explosive device in a microphone Kirk was wearing under his shirt, much like those famous pagers that Mossad terrorists set off in Lebanon last year.
And this takes us to the Jewish connection. There’s always a Jewish connection, it seems. There had been many developments within TPUSA, going back at least four months, about which I learned only after Kirk’s death. It’s clear that, while never renouncing his love of Israel nor his ties to his many kosher benefactors, he was starting to say things that were making some very powerful Jews angry. He had made some unkind remarks about Jewish support for subversive causes. Some of this came out in podcasts which can still be viewed on the Internet, like the one he did with Megyn Kelly, a former Fox News blabbermouth, in which both voiced their displeasure at being attacked by Jewish friends for pushing back ever so mildly against Israeli government policies. There’s much more. During his speaking events, he had started allowing staunchly anti-Zionist luminaries to have their say. He was becoming troubled by the continuing slaughter of Palestinian civilians. In June, during a visit to the White House, Trump threw a fit when Kirk expressed his objection to the U.S. bombing Iran. Two months later, he infuriated some influential Jews whom he met with in the Hamptons, including Zionist hardliner and hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman, when he turned down a huge infusion of cash into TPUSA’s coffers, and declined an invitation to fly to Israel and meet with Netanyahu, whom he had come to loathe as a bully. Very dangerous indeed. You don’t snub the godfather of global terrorism without serious repercussions. And then there was Kirk’s Israeli security detail at his last engagement in Utah. Pulling off an assassination, with the right actors and an elaborate cover story in place, is child’s play to these subhumans. The dumb goyim never learn. They’ll go on believing everything they see and hear on Jewish television. But really, only the dumbest of the dumb could have stomached watching Kirk’s funeral extravaganza, complete with musicians and sparklers, in an Arizona football stadium, attended by 100,000, including Trump, Vance, and the rest of the gang. It was a bizarre way to honor a martyr. Hamming it up, weeping crocodile tears, Erika Kirk, the weird, wealthy widow, invoked Jesus in forgiving Tyler Robinson, though without mentioning his name. You can watch the entire five-hour performance on the Internet if you happen to be a masochist.
As I said, I can’t possibly touch on every aspect of the Kirk saga. What I mentioned in the previous paragraph is what I took from the Internet, the content of which should always be approached with caution. Well, some details may be off, but I believe all of the above. For a deeper dive, I highly recommend Wyatt Peterson’s excellent Web site truthblitzkrieg.com. His most recent article is “Did Israel Kill Charlie Kirk?” My answer to that question is an emphatic yes. The evidence backs it, and they had a good reason to kill him. Israel is heavily dependent on the financial support of Christian evangelicals, and Kirk, their point man, had wandered off the reservation, becoming a real threat to their cash flow. And, of course, Jews have a long history of assassinating people they regard as a threat. They wrote the book on it, literally. It’s who they are. It’s what they do. Read the Old Testament some time. Better yet, read the bestseller Rise and Kill First, subtitled “The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations,” written by proud Jew Ronen Bergman, a contributor to the New York Times, and published in 2018. He chronicles so many assassinations in this sickening book, mainly in Europe and the Middle East, it’ll make your head spin. The title, taken from a passage in the Talmud, says it all.
Once again, the parallel with the JFK assassination is uncanny. Kennedy, a liberal Democrat, had plenty of Jewish support. I’m sure they particularly liked his stance on the so-called civil rights movement, and his aggressive program to crush White dissent and desegregate the South. But earlier in his life he had expressed an admiration for Adolf Hitler, and it was common knowledge that his father, Joseph Sr., had a pronounced streak of anti-Semitism. Not good. More important, JFK had an acrimonious relationship with then Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion, and was adamant that Israel should not acquire nuclear weapons. He had to go. I firmly believe that the Israelis were behind JFK’s murder, with the help of some domestic operatives who couldn’t stand him. But as with Kirk, the controlled media did not publicize his tensions with the Israeli government, and to this day very few Americans know about this. The Camelot myth and the image of a beloved leader slain by a Communist bum was a much better option than letting him live, especially since his successor, the beast Lyndon Baines Johnson, was an all-out traitor and the best friend Israel could hope for. As for Kirk’s heir apparent, an effeminate 19-year-old weenie named Brilyn Hollyhand, I doubt TPUSA will be the same without Charlie, even though Erika continues to run the family business. It’s just a matter of time before the kid makes his first pilgrimage to Jerusalem.
Let me wind this up by saying a few words about the genocidal maniac who runs Israel, a creature whose bloodlust and perfidy knows no bounds, and who very likely ordered Kirk to be taken out. Recall that just one day earlier, on September 9th, Israeli missiles hit an area of Doha, the capital of Qatar, where Hamas officials were scheduled to gather. Qatar, like the other oil-rich Arab states, has, or had, lukewarm relations with Israel. The country has the largest U.S. air base in the Middle East, Al-Udeid, where 8000 American military personnel are stationed. It would’ve been interesting had a missile or two gone off course and hit Al-Udeid. In spite of the incredible aptitude for deception that characterizes Jews in power, it seems that Netanyahu has become so reckless and out of touch with reality that he thinks he can get away with absolutely anything, even while his options are shrinking. Like his good friend in the White House, he lies almost every time he opens his mouth, and may actually believe the things he says. There must be a few million Americans, including good people scattered throughout the military and other branches of the federal government, who believe he had Kirk murdered. So what American with a large following who’s wary of Israel these days — say, Thomas Massie, Candace Owens, or even wimpy Tucker Carlson — can he assassinate next, without increasing those suspicions tenfold? Intoxicated by their power, he and his Jewish apologists in the U.S. have painted themselves into a corner with their increasingly wild hallucinations. Wouldn’t it be great if some prominent American man or woman blurted out, on live television, that Netanyahu was the mastermind of 9/11 and Kirk’s assassination, and should be arrested without delay? And that all financial aid and weapons shipments to Israel should end immediately? Are we approaching that point? I’d like to think so, but I’m also a realist.
Rest in peace, Charlie. You weren’t much, but at least near the end you showed us that you had some principles. Maybe, like John F. Kennedy, you’ll do more for your people and what’s left of your country in death than you did in life.
(Note: I finished writing this essay on October 9th, shortly before I heard the news that Netanyahu had agreed to a ceasefire with Hamas. As if lasting peace is on the horizon, and life will now return to normal for Palestinians after 80% of Gaza has been flattened, not to mention the incalculable scale of death and suffering. The butcher almost certainly yielded to intense pressure on the homefront, but anyone who takes this ceasefire seriously is extremely naïve. Israel’s leaders have broken every agreement they’ve ever made, except those few that were expedient for them to uphold. Expect more Israeli terror in the region, with the usual lies and justifications.)
Charlie Kirk Murder Weapon Revealed And How The Brown Shirt Man (Professional Assassin) Killed Him
Is this the actual assassination of Charlie Kirk that the media has been covering up? Click the link and then you decide.